[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Re: xpath: which is right?
This sentence was of course condensing the spec like crazy. Look for the rules for <xsl:for-each> and <xsl:apply-templates> when there is no <xsl:sort> element. Michael Kay > -----Original Message----- > From: David Tolpin [mailto:dvd@d...] > Sent: 04 April 2004 16:07 > To: xml-dev@l... > Subject: RE: Re: xpath: which is right? > > > > itym XML::XPath is wrong then as it is the one which uses > document > > > order, as opposed to libxslt which uses reversed document order. > > > > In both XPath 1.0 and 2.0, nodes on a reverse axis are > *numbered* in reverse > > document order, but *delivered* in forwards document order. > > > > Michael Kay > > > > (slight caveat for 1.0: XPath doesn't define in what order > the nodes are > > delivered, but XSLT does). > > I've searched XSLT 1.0 specification for string 'deliver' and didn't > find any matches. How does the specification define the order of > delivery? > > David > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an > initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org> > > The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ > > To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription > manager: <http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/index.php> > >
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|