[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: XPath terminology

• To: "'Tim Bray'" <tbray@t...>,"'Philippe Poulard'" <Philippe.Poulard@s...>
• Subject: RE: XPath terminology
• From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>
• Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 21:58:15 -0000
• Cc: <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <8EA1A899-6D49-11D8-80CA-000A95A51C9E@t...>
• Thread-index: AcQBWYNQIwfGWJI2Tz62nPlhXbMG5gAD/gMg

# >
# > examples :
# > /foo/bar[2]/oof[5]/@rab
# > /foo/bar[2]/oof[5]/text()[2]
# >
# > is there a name or should i invent one ?
# 
# I'm pretty sure that this is what Ted Nelson called a "Tumbler" in the
# Xanadu terminology. -Tim

It is not, of course, the simplest XPath expression to reach a given node.
There are shorter expressions such as

/*[1]/*[3]/*[4]

Or

(//*)[87]

Both the above also have the great advantage that they have no dependency on
namespace prefixes.

Michael Kay

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XPath terminology
    • From: Philippe Poulard <Philippe.Poulard@s...>

• References:
  • Re: XPath terminology
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Character entities and document encoding
• Next by Date: Re: SAX - endDocument() confusion again
• Previous by thread: Re: XPath terminology
• Next by thread: Re: XPath terminology
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread