[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Local Vs Global Vocabularies ( Was RE: When Spam Filters Spam
Possibly but I don't think so. I get a message from that address about twice a week. Because of the title, this mail will get one too. It just doesn't appreciate Monty Python. :-) "Spam Spam Spam Spam" Anywho... better topic. When designing vocabularies for very large communities, how do youse guys/y'all/anyone approach the dilemma of scale vs localization? In reading a currently proposed language, we find that the approach taken was to review some n number of examples and boil that down to some n number of productions. It seems sensible enough until one actually tries to implement that for local sites and discovers how much customization one puts back to deal with the fact that boiling it down proved to be locally lossy even if globally complete. Of course, XSLT cures all ills, but .... len From: Michael Champion [mailto:mc@x...] On Feb 20, 2004, at 9:25 AM, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote: > Automation just ain't smart enough. Note reason. Or people ain't smart enough to install decent spam filters, or virus scanners that don't spam the random addresses in an infected machines address book that are forged in outgoing spam. The state of the automation art is well beyond this. [I'm still infatuated with SpamBayes after a year] For all we know, this was generated by one of those spam filters advertised by spamming :-)
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|