Cart
|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Expertise and Innovation - was Re: Non-Borg serv
 Michael Kay wrote: > My first reaction was quite different but equally > wrong. I thought he was totally naïve to imagine > that he could get the world to agree on one > standard for doing this stuff. No. You weren't wrong. It was, I think, totally naïve to imagine that people would standardize on a single standard. The fact that it happened doesn't make it any less naïve. (But, the fact that it was naïve shouldn?t detract from the value of what was done. Please understand that I am not trying to take away from what TBL did.) In my own work on Hypertext/HyperInformation back in the 80's, I now know that I spent much too much time worrying about trying to ensure that our system would work well with a wide variety of systems. I, unlike TBL, *assumed* that introducing a new document format would be a failure... This was in part because I was also responsible for ALL-IN-1, which already supported a wide variety of word processors, document formats, etc. and I assumed that a new tool wouldn't be successful unless it supported all of the different ways of viewing and encoding text, information, etc. Frankly, TBL had the advantage of doing his work on the Unix platform and on Unix where there simply wasn't the same variety of entrenched formats, investment in competing formats, etc. as on other platforms. Most Unix documents were simply 7-bit ASCII text and could be easily pointed to by even the earliest web browsers (even though they wouldn't contain out-bound links, you could at least display a text document in the earliest web browsers). Unix didn't have much commercial penetration and thus there weren't many "big bucks" application developers who would have economic objections to a standard growing in a way that compromised them. Thus, TBL's web was birthed in a relatively "green field" environment and able to grow some strength before it was unleashed into the less friendly world of Windows, VMS, etc... I am personally convinced that if TBL had released his first versions on any other operating system, most of us would never have heard about it. The commercial weakness of Unix may have been one of the key reasons that TBL's web was successful. Perhaps what needs to be said here is that assuming a single standard could be achieved was less naïve on Unix than it would have been elsewhere... Those of us who were on non-Unix platforms tended to evaluate work like TBL's from within the value-systems and constraints of the platforms on which we worked. TBL was working in a different environment -- an environment with less variety in document formats and fewer estalished commercial interests to fight him. bob wyman 
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! 
Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||
