microsoft.htmleditor,microsoft htmleditor,c14n microsoft net,htmleditor 2007, xml%%%microsoft.htmleditor - RE: Microsoft files for XML patents, says C

[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Microsoft files for XML patents, says C|Net


microsoft.htmleditor
If this is that broad, it will be broadly ignored and 
there will become a class action suit that winds up in front 
of the US Supreme Court given means.

That is more likely than not.  The wolf is threatening 
the livelihood of the village.  The US will not surrender 
its position in the global software industry for the 
sake of badly executed patent applications.   The patent 
office executives must know this, but are likely not in a 
position to reform the system.  That means it is a congressional 
issue and with pressure from the courts brought by pressure 
from industry, means would meet needs.   At this time, feeding 
the wolf is cost effective but again, the wolf gets up 
every morning ravenous.  Until it becomes blisteringly and 
monetarily punishing, I don't know what incentive there 
is to file such suits and against whom.

Meanwhile, informed parties must continually and openly debate 
the issues so that they are known and congeal prior to those 
actions.  The American software industry must take this on 
although our power does not extend to the Europeans where 
the patent was filed.  If there is to be resistance, it will 
have to be global.

Be aware that trademarks are adjectives that can become names. 
This is a thorny problem because one way to 'defend' a trademark 
is to attach it to other common but untrademarked phrases.  One 
could easily have trademarked "HTMLEditor" that way.  That is a 
mess which isn't being noticed as much as the patents.  It makes 
it quite hard to write a decent standard when companies are 
opportunistic.

len


From: Bob Wyman [mailto:bob@w...]

Perhaps they should trademark their names and declare that
these names can only be used in patent claims if the inventor agrees to
pay royalties to W3C? Or, perhaps, we can just find a way to get this
business of patenting substitution of equivalents done away with.

		bob wyman

[1] http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?patentnumber=6662341

[As always, please be aware that this is *not* an "anti-Microsoft" post.
What they are doing, no matter how wrong it may be, is no different from
what many others are doing, have done, or seek to do.]

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
 

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.


Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.