[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: RDDL(2): new version up

• To: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>
• Subject: Re: RDDL(2): new version up
• From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>
• Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 12:20:03 -0500
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <1074532164.24859.634.camel@delleric>
• References: <0494A708-49EF-11D8-B62D-000A95BA5A2C@o...> <1074458181.24853.364.camel@delleric> <8CDD5CB2-4A08-11D8-81B2-000A95BA5A2C@o...> <p06010206bc31a291caf6@[192.168.254.4]> <008a01c3deaa$18e89c50$6403a8c0@ARIMATHEA> <1074532164.24859.634.camel@delleric>
• User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i

Eric van der Vlist scripsit:

> I use it for all my major projects as well. Even if that doesn't make an
> awful lot of vocabulary, I use it as I have shown in my examples (a
> rddl:resource embedding a whole <div/> with often several links and even
> if the upgrade would be feasible through a XSLT transformation, I
> consider that it would decrease the expressiveness of the links.

As to the uptake of XLink, it is used by XTM, the XML representation of
topic maps, which is definitely important within its scope.

-- 
My confusion is rapidly waxing          John Cowan
For XML Schema's too taxing:            jcowan@r...
    I'd use DTDs                        http://www.reutershealth.com
    If they had local trees --          http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
I think I best switch to RELAX NG.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: RDDL(2): new version up
    • From: Andy Greener <andy@g...>
  • Re: RDDL(2): new version up
    • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>

• References:
  • RDDL(2): new version up
    • From: Jonathan Borden <jonathan@o...>
  • Re: RDDL(2): new version up
    • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>
  • Re: RDDL(2): new version up
    • From: Jonathan Borden <jonathan@o...>
  • Re: RDDL(2): new version up
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
  • Re: RDDL(2): new version up
    • From: "Jeff Rafter" <lists@j...>
  • Re: RDDL(2): new version up
    • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Postel's law, exceptions
• Next by Date: Re: RDDL(2): new version up
• Previous by thread: Re: RDDL(2): new version up
• Next by thread: Re: RDDL(2): new version up
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread