[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Postel's law, exceptions

• To: 'xml-dev@l... ' <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Postel's law, exceptions
• From: Michael Champion <mc@x...>
• Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 21:24:35 -0500
• In-reply-to: <830178CE7378FC40BC6F1DDADCFDD1D10190E1B6@R...>
• References: <830178CE7378FC40BC6F1DDADCFDD1D10190E1B6@R...>

On Jan 13, 2004, at 8:57 PM, Dare Obasanjo wrote:
>
> I work on RSS in my free time. The most common well-formedness errors
> are documents with incorrect encodings or documents that use HTML
> entities without a reference to the HTML DTD. How exactly do you 
> propose
> XML 1.x fix these problems?
>
I don't; I didn't take the time / thought to figure out that Sam Ruby's 
'scientific experiment' document contained an encoding error rather 
than a  character that was illegal in XML 1.0.  Sorry for blathering 
without thinking.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Postel's law, exceptions
    • From: Michael Champion <mc@x...>

• References:
  • RE: Postel's law, exceptions
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Postel's law, exceptions
• Next by Date: RE: Postel's law, exceptions
• Previous by thread: RE: Postel's law, exceptions
• Next by thread: Re: Postel's law, exceptions
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread