[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Schema fragments for everyday stuff
"Bullard, Claude L (Len)" wrote: > > From: Chiusano Joseph [mailto:chiusano_joseph@b...] > > >> But is already referenced in an RFP sitting on my desk > >> as we speak and it is older than a few weeks. The antecedents > >> have been around for three years at least. > > >Yes - that's an issue that we discussed 2 weeks ago in San Diego at the > >DOJ IWG (Industry Working Group) meeting. The discussions are underway > >with the proper folks, and hopefully some clarity will emerge in the > >future. > > And the proper folks would be? DOJ IWG Membership: http://www.ijis.org/membership/index.html Kind Regards, Joe Chiusano Booz | Allen | Hamilton Strategy and Technology Consultants to the World How many of the people at these > meetings are public safety vendor representatives, as in, the > people who bid, implement, and maintain these systems for the > public safety agencies vs. the people who consult, fund grants, > and manage Federal programs for creating specifications and > standards? I am familiar with the different states and agencies > such as LASD and San Diego that want to implement this. I > am also aware that they are having distinct problems finding > vendors who can reliably provide it. Design for the BigBuyer > is suicide if it can't really scale down into the Tier 2 > and Tier 3 markets. That is the fundamental problem. > > Fact: this stuff is about three to five years ahead of its > market. The public safety industry is about eight years > behind the cutting edge and the public safety market is a > late adopter market. The very real danger for DoJ XML > efforts is like CALS IETMs, in that gap from initiative > to fielding, the relentless standardization committee > efforts will create overbuilt products which both > customer and industry will reject at the point of > procurement because they don't meet the immediate and > short to medium term needs. IOW, they are white elephants > at point of sale and collapse into the smaller more > focused and adaptible designs. > > How long has NIBRS been around and what is its degree > and rate of penetration into the states? IOW, how > many agencies are still UCR? > > >Yes - extensions are another issue that we discussed in San Diego. I > >anticipate that more clarity will emerge on this in the future. > > They will emerge from the agencies that buy the systems. > > >Lastly, I should mention that I also sit on a steering committee (since > >late 2003) that oversees the Justice XML initiatives (I don't get into > >the fine points of the schema techniques and design, but rather the > >general direction and issues such as extension metholodologies, etc.). > > Go for it. This is a CALS redux. That isn't a critique; it is > an admonition about expectations and mission drift. > > >Please feel free to provide any feedback that you'd like to me on > >GJXDD/M and I would be happy to see that it's justly considered. > > Thanks! Just understand the problem of changing the wheels on > a moving car at an intersection. XML is being implemented for > public safety quickly, but the web technologies themselves are > a barrier to doing that reliably, securely, and safely. The > platform matters. > > len
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|