[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: RDDL(2): new version up
elharo@m... (Elliotte Rusty Harold) writes: >This proposal does >not appear to add any useful new features compared to RDDL 1.0. What >is lacking in RDDL 1.0, and is this lack addressed by RDDL 2.0? If >that question doesn't have a good answer, we should stick with RDDL >1.0. After thinking about this for a while, I'm with Elliotte. Comparing the two, I don't see any real pluses in the 2.0 proposal. I did follow the conversation on www-tag and even liked some of the proposals at the time, but comparing the results leaves me shrugging my shoulders. At the very least, I'd agree with Jonathan that "perhaps we ought use a different *namespace name*" for these vocabularies.
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|