[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Noise-free Complex Systems
rsalz@d... (Rich Salz) writes: >> It seems like the people who've tried hardest to push the world to an >> infoset-centric view of XML are now finding that even that isn't >> consistent enough for their needs. > >Not that I disagree, but on what do you base this? Years of reading mailing lists, and TimBL's message at: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2004Jan/0013.html The list of "ways serializations vary" is especially interesting, as none of them seem founded on the SGML core - they're all about features added later. I (probably foolishly) wrote www-tag a reply to Tim's message that builds on this. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2004Jan/0017.html Floor wax. Dessert topping. Whatever. -- Simon St.Laurent Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets Errors, errors, all fall down! http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|