[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Why XML Schema is so large


Re:  Why XML Schema is so large
> > 
> > What does 'a technology is complex' mean?
> > 
> > For me, a good metric is the relative size of errata. For xml 
> > schema datatypes, the errata is one quarter of the size of 
> > the document. And error corrections don't add clarity 
> > (usually), they sacrifice clarity for the sake of unambiguity.
> > 
> 
> I don't think complexity and bugginess are necessarily related. Schema
> Part 1 is far more complex than part 2, but far less buggy.

What I am trying to talk about is 'unorthogonality'. Bugginess is a consequence
of unorthogonality.

http://www.faqs.org/docs/artu/ch04s02.html

David Tolpin

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
 

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.


Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.