Cart
|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: The Cognitive Style of PowerPoint
 Feedback mediated adaptation. Language does shape thought. Thought shapes language. We know what language is, evidently. Thought is a topic of endless speculation but little evidence. A difficult tool (say Roman numerals) slows thought one might speculate. A robust tool enables thought to develop quickly one might speculate. Proof is hard to come by and is anecdotal. Because language is external and can be represented both behaviorally and symbolically, we have more theories about that. Because thought is studied indirectly, we have more indirect theories about it. Because language is both symbolic and behavioral, the tools analogy is rough at best. History is not simply a tools parade although tools are important. Environmental events (say the ice age) are part of that study. A proper study of language development and thought development (whatever thought is) would include habit formation. Someone just posted yetAnotherSemanticDrift paper to HumanML list noting the difficulties of scientific communications in archaeology with its habit of mixing in terms from different disciplines (say describing arrowheads). In some ways, this is not dissimilar from our problems with frameworks to support multiple namespaced documents. See, we can get any thread back to XML. ;-) len From: Benjamin Franz [mailto:snowhare@n...] On Tue, 16 Dec 2003, Joshua Allen wrote: > The fact that mathematics can be performed optionally using roman or > Arabic numerals proves my point (a Sapir-Whorf style "proof" would > strive to show that one system makes certain thoughts impossible). No. _Simple arithmetic_ can be performed (wheezingly, painfully, by the hair of your teeth) with Roman numerals. Mathematics would be impossibly painful. And was. There is a _reason_ the hard (mathematically based) sciences didn't take off in Europe until _after_ Arabic numerals came into widespread use. They _couldn't_. > And my computer calculates faster and more accurately using strings of bit > patterns; no Roman numerals or Arabic numerals at all. 0 and 1 used in a positional value notation system essentially identical to the decimal (Arabic numerals) system. You are not helping yourself. > Maybe you are missing my point -- linguistic determinism says that > thought is enabled and structured by language; I am arguing that the > *opposite* is true in the vast majority of cases that matter. > Language is simply a tool that humans create to assist us in our > communications and cognition, and like any tool, words are subordinate > to their master. Archeologists will tell you that _EVERY_ major historical change has been the result of new tools (both mental and physical). In in fact that is how they catalog the history of humanity: The invention of fire, stone tools, metal tools, agriculture, writing. Those _tools_ fundamentally reshaped the societies in which they were dicovered and from there the thoughts of those societies. The view that, somehow, thought 'reigns supreme' over the tools the thought has to work with is a fallacy. The two interact and shape each other in deep and fundamental ways. Far from being the 'master', thought is engaged in an ongoing symbiotic dance with its tools. -- Benjamin Franz On that of which one cannot speak, one must remain silent. ---Wittgenstein ----------------------------------------------------------------- The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl> 
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! 
Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||
