[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: The Cognitive Style of PowerPoint


my cognitive style
At 2003-12-15 09:46 -0500, Jonathan Robie wrote:
>I just finished presenting an 8 hour tutorial and two presentations using 
>PowerPoint
>...
>What is the "cognitive style" of writing documents in XML vs. PowerPoint, 
>Word, or FrameMaker?

Isn't cognitive style based on the nature of the information rather than 
the tool being used?

>Do the tools we use to write affect the way we think?

Absolutely!  Which means you should use a tool that matches with the way 
you need to think.

I have to project my tutorial and presentation materials to an audience, 
but the act of projection is the final step of the process.  My cognitive 
structure I've chosen for teaching is "course/module/lesson/frame/pane" 
where each pane represents something that I want my students to see and to 
which I talk and present.  Whether that final pane is shown using HTML, 
PowerPoint, a page generated by XSL-FO, or whatever, that doesn't change 
the way I *think* about the material I'm teaching.

It happens I use HTML for projecting a pane because I have more flexibility 
for working with long panes where content flows off the bottom of the 
screen.  I can scroll up and down, jump around the page, and do what I need 
that I cannot do with a fixed-frame-sized Microsoft PowerPoint or 
OpenOffice Impress.

So, to think about my course or presentation as just that, I use 
hierarchical XML as my tool because the non-hierarchical desktop 
presentation tools don't reflect the way I think about teaching my material.

In fact I think using my XML structure improves my presentations because it 
forces me to think in the pedagogical fashion that I've modeled.

I've noted XML-related slide-show models that I've seen that are freely 
available are just for slide shows ... a flat, non-hierarchical collection 
of pages.  Even though those are XML I cannot use them to organize my 
material in the nature of the way I teach ... which is why all along I 
stick to my internal document model.  Just writing the content in XML 
doesn't address my "cognitive style" of working with training information 
... only using my private document model addresses my style of thinking of 
training.

Which isn't to say that is the way I think *all* people should deliver 
training material ... I've just tuned my stuff to work with the way I do it.

At 2003-12-15 09:46 -0500, Jonathan Robie wrote:
>at a conference where they strongly prefer that we write our presentations 
>in XML.

Note that at XML'2003 I was only asked to submit my paper in XML, I wasn't 
asked to submit my presentation slides in XML.  They've mandated a document 
model related to the semantics of writing a paper, and I was able to fit 
that just fine as all I was doing when writing a paper was writing a 
paper.  The associated slides that I projected were authored separately, 
and that is fine with me as the organization of my projection is 
necessarily different than the organization of my paper.  My audiences 
wouldn't accept me projecting my paper (full of paragraphs) but do accept 
me projecting my bulleted layout and repackaging of the information.

I hope this helps.

...................... Ken

--
North America (Washington, DC): 3-day XSLT/2-day XSL-FO 2004-02-09
Instructor-led on-site corporate, government & user group training
for XSLT and XSL-FO world-wide:  please contact us for the details

G. Ken Holman                 mailto:gkholman@C...
Crane Softwrights Ltd.          http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/x/
Box 266, Kars, Ontario CANADA K0A-2E0    +1(613)489-0999 (F:-0995)
ISBN 0-13-065196-6                       Definitive XSLT and XPath
ISBN 0-13-140374-5                               Definitive XSL-FO
ISBN 1-894049-08-X   Practical Transformation Using XSLT and XPath
ISBN 1-894049-11-X               Practical Formatting Using XSL-FO
Member of the XML Guild of Practitioners:     http://XMLGuild.info
Male Breast Cancer Awareness  http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/x/bc


PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
 

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.


Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.