[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] XUL != Mozilla
> XUL is not a bad idea Gerald, it was simply badly > implemented, badly > marketed, badly supported. And this doesn't suppress > the fact that you have > probably invested a lot of efforts into your site, > simply that you do not > have the resource to push that into the market and > that Mozilla was a living > dead (or sleeping beauty) for a long time. Didier, just to get the story straight. XUL stands for XML UI Language and is not bound to Mozilla. XUL is a language family to use XML to build rich UIs. For example, if you look at Microsoft XUL or at Macromedia XUL or at Luxor XUL and so on you will find - suprise, suprise - that everybody is using the <button> tag to create buttons. (Of course, the high-minded W3C academics had to reinvent the wheel and insist on using <trigger> in XForms.) Anyway, your analysis about possible XUL adoption is also completely flawed. If you can learn on thing from history, it's that big players (e.g. Micromedia, Microsoft, etc.) ignore standards and instead push their own wares. The only proven way to build a rich internet for everyone is to threaten their inbred clunker with free open-source alternatives. Unfortunately, it takes quite a while to build up the code base as most people prefer to free ride and play the arm chair critic. I'm sure you know what I mean. - Gerald ______________________________________________________________________ Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|