[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Why I Like Longhorn and XAML
> On the bright side, they also seem to have discarded W3C XML Schema in > favor of WinFS, probably because there wasn't a "straightforward way to > adapt those technologies to Microsoft's purpose." No, that is most likely because XML Schema is confusing and requires eletrical circuit diagrams to explain how certain things work (http://www.olegdulin.com/archives/000017.html , excuse my sarcasm) . I haven't seem WinFS but my guess is that it is probably much simpler to use than Schema and does not require a B.Sc. in EE and Masters in Comp. Sci. Oleg > > That one I can sympathize with. > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an > initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org> > > The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ > > To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription > manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl> > >
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|