[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: ASN.1 is an XML Schema Language (Fix those lists!)and Bina
Alessandro Triglia wrote: > Amelia A. Lewis wrote: >>We believe in unicode and concrete syntax. > > Good. So you don't believe in schemas. That's fine. Just use XML 1.0. I don't think that that happens to be what Amy said (apologies if I presume wrong). The fact is that at this point in time any schema language for XML defines one single concrete syntax. And a fair part of what the ASN.1 people do not seem to understand is that the XML folks see that as a *good* thing. The ASN.1 equivalent of a simple XML parser in terms of universality would have to properly decode (and likely handle negotiation for) BER, PER, CER, DER, XER, and probably LWER, OER, and SER. That's a bit of a behemoth to implement! There's a lot to say in favour of minimizing the number of concrete syntaxes, and that's where a lot of the concerns about having *two* (just two!) universal formats came from at the binary infosets workshop. Not having two means that there'll be twenty different ones out there; having two may be harmful to interoperability in that it enforces (as opposed to just making available) an increase in options. This is a hard question to decide. Choice is only technically good when you're the one choosing ;) Or at least, when you like all the flavours that can be chosen from. -- Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...> Research Scientist, Expway http://expway.com/ 7FC0 6F5F D864 EFB8 08CE 8E74 58E6 D5DB 4889 2488
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|