[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Re: Gold Standard Schema Parser was Re: XMLSchem
John Cowan <cowan@m...> writes: > Henry S. Thompson scripsit: > >> Without being >> specific in a way which would be inappropriate given my W3C position, >> I would say that my experience over the last six months is a >> significant decrease in interop problems among the three or four best >> schema processors. > > I don't think it would be inappropriate for you to mention which > three or four you have in mind, in a posting with an appropriate > disclaimer, and noting that silence does not mean disapprobation. Well, I'll say that I have seen very few examples in the last six months where XSV, SQC and Xerces don't agree, and most of those arise because of areas of the REC which XSV has never implemented. I definitely would not want this comment to be understood as a positive or negative assessment of any other product. ht -- Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh Half-time member of W3C Team 2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@c... URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/ [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|