[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE : Comparison of Xml documents
The original problem is the comparison of two XML documents of the same class defined by a schema. The question is : could we compare two documents by using the schema defining the class of documents. Especially, knowing that two instances documents are of the same class, that their elements are the same, except that the order is not the same, is the schema give us enough infos to determine wether the instances documents are the same or not. It is why I evoked three kind of ordering : 1) order in a document according to the tags name (without specifying for tags with the same name) 2) order in a document according to a feature of tags with the same name Those two informations contribute in the definition of a class of documents (but is it enough to compare the documents on the order criteria?). 3) order in the instances themselves. I explain : We have two tags that containing only one type of sub-tags with no order specification of type 1 or 2 in the schema, and those two tags contain the same sub-tags (ordered in the same way or not), how to specify a comparison information that permits to determine wether the tags are the same or not. Example : A: <e1><e2 att="1"/><e2 att="2"/></e1> B: <e1><e2 att="2"/><e2 att="1"/></e1> Tags e2 are not ordered because order info in the schema is "not ordered", but are they the same in this case? The one who design the class of documents should know. It depends on a semantic feature that is not possible to give in a schema with the different specs existing (XSD, relaxNG...) : as I know there is no schema spec allowing this (no "comparison" spec?). Conclusion: When defining a class of XML documents, it should be nice if we could give "comparison" infos (two instances of the class are the same?) in association with "validation" infos (is the instance in the class?) that are, sometimes, not sufficient for the comparison. -----Message d'origine----- De : Bob Wyman [mailto:bob@w...] Envoyé : jeudi 20 novembre 2003 18:48 À : 'Alaric B Snell'; GARNIER Pierre Cc : xml-dev@l... Objet : RE: Comparison of Xml documents Alaric B Snell wrote: > in ASN.1 you can specify if order is important within a > compound object - if order matters it's a SEQUENCE, > otherwise it's a SET :-) Alaric, you may be overstating the case for ASN.1 here. There are two kinds of ordering discussed in Pierre Garnier's message. I think ASN.1 only handles one of them which is clearly the one you mentioned, however, some folk might think you also meant the other. In ASN.1 you can specify that things are either a SEQUENCE or a SET. Elements within a SEQUENCE are ordered while elements within a SET are not. Thus, given: ordered ::= SEQUENCE { part1 INTEGER, part2 INTEGER } Your XML encoding could be: <ordered> <part1>1111</part1> <part2>2222</part2> </ordered> But, the following would be illegal since part2 comes before part1: <ordered> <part2>2222</part2> <part1>1111</part1> </ordered> If you want to be able to provide part1 and part2 in either order, you would define a SET instead. You would write: ordered ::= SET { part1 INTEGER, part2 INTEGER } But this is only one kind of ordering mentioned in Pierre's message. This is ordering of the structural elements of a message. I think he also wants to have elements ordered according to their values. Thus, if you allowed multiple "part1"s to appear in a SEQUENCE or SET, the question is which should come first? Pierre seems to indicate that he wants the order determined by the value of instances of the elements -- not by their types. i.e. he wants to permit: <ordered> <part>111</part> <part>222</part> </ordered> while prohibiting: <ordered> <part>222</part> <part>111</part> </ordered> I don't think ASN.1 supports this kind of constraint in the standard syntax. Or, have I missed something in the spec? bob wyman
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|