[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: About OWL syntax
Hi Thomas, Thomas said: Remember that any OWL statement is also a valid RDF statement. Therefore you can serialize it any way you like that conforms with the RDF serialization Rec. You are not limited to the form of those examples. Didier replies: Does it mean that I can serialize a valid OWL statement as below? owl:Class rdf:ID="ConsumableThing"> <owl:ObjectProperty rdf:ID="madeFromFruit"> <rdfs:range rdf:resource="#Fruit" /> </owl:ObjectProperty> .... other property definition .... </owl:class> Would that statement still a valid OWL document as specified in the recommendation? If yes, this could be suggested as a good practice. I was convinced that the syntax as illustrated in the example was constrained by RDFS and that RDFS considers properties and classes as disjoint elements. So, can I make the inference that RDFS class elements can also contain property elements? Cheers Didier PH Martin
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|