[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: UTF-8+names
tbray@t... (Tim Bray) writes: >Consider this: > ><?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8+names" ?> ><p>Ask Martin Dürst.</p> > >It is well-formed. With no DTD. -Tim And if I had a DTD, with my own entity declarations? Perhaps even one for ü ? Between this and XInclude, a lot of people are dancing around entities, but they seem to create new problems thanks to unexplained layering. I'm looking for alternate approaches to entity processing myself, but I'm not going to touch technologies which solve problems sometimes maybe if the right collection of software happens to be present. What processes these things? When? Why? What are existing processors supposed to do? This makes XML 1.1 look like a walk in the park as far as change is concerned. And is there a UTF-16+names? -- Simon St.Laurent Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets Errors, errors, all fall down! http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|