[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: can you use inheritance (extension) in relax ng?

  • To: 'Joe English' <jenglish@f...>, xml-dev@l...
  • Subject: RE: can you use inheritance (extension) in relax ng?
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
  • Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2003 13:20:59 -0500

RE:  can you use inheritance (extension) in relax ng?
It is a good paper.  This documents the results that the VRML 
community made note of during the X3D design effort.  The term 
"impedance mismatch" was used widely there as well and described 
on this list.  The chilling effect of the network effect is that 
VRML doubled back on a clear and clean object description to 
use XML.   We get the tools but at the cost of clarity in the 
model by having to boot it up a level of abstraction to 
accomodate two data models (XML and VRML97) and two syntaxes.

While the use and convenience of this is obvious, there is something 
spooky about making concepts such as compositors first class 
data objects.   It has the same uncomfortable feel to it that 
WYSIWYG does but I can't quite say why.

So the future of Longhorn is XML as first class objects and XUL?
The MID lives.

Commodity marketing: the best shall be worst because the least 
are the most.  The success of the web architecture is that it 
mandated that all applications should be equally uncaring and 
dumb by removing the possibility of agressive local evolution.  
As was hoped for, XML and its attendant processes have hogtied 
the dominant vendors, successfully slowing their rate of innovation, 
and constrained the web mavens into debating the details of an 
architecture already moribund by the time it became dominant. 
Now the new predators will emerge from the niches.

The revenge of the forty-somethings is complete.

len


From: Joe English [mailto:jenglish@f...]

Dare Obasanjo wrote:
> [Simon St.Laurent]:
> > If I was interested in building type systems around XML documents, I
> > think I'd be even more frustrated with W3C XML Schema than I am today.
>
> You're not the only one. See
> http://www.research.microsoft.com/~emeijer/Papers/XML2003/xml2003.html

This is the most promising approach to "data-oriented" XML
that I've seen.  I think Meijer's on to something here.

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
 

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.


Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.