[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: stupid deterministic content model question


stupid paras
David Tolpin <dvd@d...> writes:

> > I'm having a blackout. Is (para+|(para*, summary)) deterministic?
> 
> No, it is not.
> 
> > What I want is at least one element, at most one summary, and if a
> > summary appears, it should be the last element.
> 
> (para*,(para|summary))

Hm, how would <para/><para/><para/> match this? The three paras would
match "para*", and then there would be nothing to satisfy
"para|summary".

Is (a*, a) satisfiable at all? It reads as "forever and one day".

Ari.

-- 
Elections only count as free and trials as fair if you can lose
money betting on the outcome.

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
 

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.


Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.