[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Fwd: [e-lang] Protocol implementation errors
Miles Sabin wrote: > Depends how you look at it. ASN.1 has a long and relatively successful > history of use directly in network protocol elements. XML has a (not > quite so long) history as passive protocol _payload_, but it's use > directly in network protocol elements is comparatively novel with > XML-RPC or SOAP/WSDL/WS-CHOR or XMPP. > > So who's proposing the change? Maybe the burden of proof lies with > ASN.1's detractors? Questions of quality of the underlying protocol aside, XML has a huge lead in terms of the number range of available tools. -Tim
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|