[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Managing Innovation
Rick Marshall writes: > that's what ibm said 20 years ago and every design since has had to > cope with 640k base memory ranges and other "that'll be more than > enough" decisions. I understand that argument well, but in this case, we're not talking about limiting the overall length of XML documents. Let's try not to imagine only the present, but the future as well -- can anyone make a reasonable case for an XML element or attribute name longer than 4096 characters (for example)? All the best, David
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|