[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: file extensions best practice
> -----Original Message----- > From: am [mailto:am@f...] > Sent: Monday, September 01, 2003 20:26 > To: xml-dev@l... > Subject: Re: file extensions best practice > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Christian Nentwich [mailto:christian@s...] > > The cons (?): > > > > - The files are not recognisable as XML files anymore and > the standard > > XML editors won't list them > > - Web servers won't generate the correct headers unless reconfigured > > - The space for 3 digit file prefixes is small, and ours would look > > like .x?? which make sthe space even smaller > > > > Is there anything I'm missing? What are people's opinions on this? > > What about appending the file type to the filename, and keep > the xml extension: > > blabla1_book.xml > blabla2_book.xml > > or book_blabla1.xml > book_blabla2.xml > ? Then, what about: Blabla1.book.xml Blabla2.book.xml ? I have used something like the following for some time: Mydocument.doc.zip which I think makes it clear that it is a ".doc" inside a ".zip". Alessandro Triglia > > > Adrian Maier > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org > <http://www.xml.org>, an initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|