[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: XSD question

• To: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>,"Henry S. Thompson" <ht@c...>
• Subject: RE: XSD question
• From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 09:08:41 -0700
• Cc: <xml-dev@l...>
• Thread-index: AcN7oikqddyfX9MpSeOWxdGFHrrOQwAAXgxz
• Thread-topic: XSD question

The problem lies less with the technology are more with how poorly the spec is organized and the obtuse language in which it is written. This thread is just another example of the annoying tendency for related information being in completely separate parts of the spec with no explicit connection between them. 

________________________________

From: Rick Jelliffe [mailto:ricko@a...]
Sent: Mon 9/15/2003 8:54 AM
To: Henry S. Thompson
Cc: xml-dev@l...
Subject: Re:  XSD question


Henry S. Thompson wrote:


	This editor, at least, is human,

The responsibility lies with us reviewers for not picking it up, not you as editor. 

Of course, a technology that taxes a super-human spec-writer
may tax non-super-humans readers too.

Cheers
Rick Jelliffe

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XSD question
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>

• Prev by Date: RE: XSD question
• Next by Date: Re: XSD question
• Previous by thread: RE: XSD question
• Next by thread: Re: XSD question
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread