[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Sun is forking SAX
Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...> writes: > At 10:04 PM -0700 7/20/03, K. Ari Krupnikov wrote: > > >I agree that these are poor interfaces, but aren't these the ones that > >the "full-size", j2SE JAXP specifies? > > No, that's a very common misconception, and I don't know > why. SAXParser/SAXParserFactory were added to JAXP 1.0 because it only > supported SAX 1, which did not have any equivalent of > XMLReader/XMLReaderFactory. Thank you for pointing this out. Makes perfect sense now that you mention it; I just never thought javax.xml.parsers for the makeshift extension to SAX and DOM that it is. I guess the entire package should be deprecated once DOM Level 3 L&S is finalized? It is possible that the confusion has something to do with the fact that XMLReaderFactory hides deep in the org.xml.sax.helpers package, along with classes that are mostly useful for SAX producers. Ari.
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|