[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Web Services Federation Language (WS-Federation)
In a message dated 08/07/2003 22:35:26 GMT Daylight Time, chiusano_joseph@b... writes: For those tracking GXA (the Global XML Web Services Architecture), a new One of the interesting aspects of these drafts is that they don't include an email address to which comments should be sent. Nor public archives of comments, as far as I can ascertain. I guess that is a subtle way of discouraging public comment or ensuring that any comment made is not available for others to review. Does anyone know where, for example, I can indicate to the authors that "warrantees" is a term referring to a person, not a concept as the authors seem to assume? I believe the authors wish to express the notions of "warranties". They do get it right on other occasions. Also, what is the status of these documents? They seem to be free-floating (i.e. outwith any standards organisation process). Is that accurate? Whether or not that is desirable is a separate issue. Andrew Watt
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|