[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: RE: OWL-ish question
[Linda Grimaldi] > Doesn't a restriction apply to all members of a class? What I am > looking for will vary in value by instance, not by class. And since > instances will be added all the time, I can't subclass and lump > together. > Yes - I thought that by using owl:allValuesFrom, you could restrict the hasMappingClass to include only those transitive properties (or whatever) you talked about. I assumed that those properties would have a class of their own, which would be the object of owl:allValuesFrom. > Ah, for true ternary relations :>). > Ah, for Topic Maps... :-) Cheers, Tom P
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|