[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Extending type definitions using RelaxNG Compact
James Clark wrote: > [...] TREX provided a > concur operator which would have been sufficient for this, but it didn't > make it into RelaxNG, because there are major implementation issues. What were the issues? CONCUR is easy to implement in regular expressions over strings -- it's actually a bit simpler than INTERLEAVE -- does it get tricky in tree-regular grammars? Or was it something else? <URL: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/relax-ng/200103/msg00004.html > only mentions type assignment and coherent error messages as problem areas. (Personally, I'd gladly trade both for CONCUR -- you can do some neat things with it...) --Joe English jenglish@f...
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|