[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: more politics
Thomas B. Passin wrote: > > ... IMO, we should not use a real network-retrieving > URI as an identifier for any RDF node, because the node is not a > network-retrievable thing. A copy of an RDF _graph_ may be retrievable, but > that is a different thing. If we want to have a node represent some actual > working network resource, use some appropriate property so say so. > One is _expected_ to use a network-retrieving URI as an identifier for an OWL ontology. The OWL ontology construct: <owl:Ontology rdf:about=""> <owl:versionInfo>v 1.17 2003/02/26 12:56:51 mdean</owl:versionInfo> <rdfs:comment>An example ontology</rdfs:comment> <owl:imports rdf:resource="http://www.example.org/foo"/> </owl:Ontology> is used to make assertions about the 'current URI'. Moreover, the fact that OWL ontologies are network retrievable (have URIs) is used to import one ontology into another <owl:imports> Jonathan
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|