[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Defining non-WXS datatypes
From: "Jeni Tennison" <jeni@j...> > I thought I'd spend a little time on this, so I've put together a > "datatype library language". I think this is really great: a light at the end of the tunnel, Jeni! For completeness, I think you might also need to specify a storage mapping: this might be like the normalization mapping, but instead of mapping to a string it maps to an (IDL?) data structure. It would make no difference to a validator, but it might be good for data binding and for markup minimization opportunities. On the issue of namespaces, I think it is a mistake not to require explicit prefixes in the XPaths. I also think it is a mistake to use the namespace context for the queries: better to make a Chinese wall separating namespaces used by element and attribute names, and namespaces used by content: this is what Schematron does and I think it has worked really well. No prefix should mean no namespace. It isn't a favour to users for schema languages to provide too much flexibility in this area (compare with elementFormDefault of WXS ), because the user cannot tell immediately whether an unprefixed name is in any namespace--one more thing to worry about when they need to have one fewer thing. (Forcing no-prefix=no-namespace and using separate declarations for namespaces does not reduce expresive power.) Cheers Rick Jelliffe
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|