[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: XUL Standardization: Lessons from the RSS Civil War
My mistake. I remember having a long debate with Dan C. about it being normative. I would prefer it were. In the long run, I think it advantageous to keep these two works symmetrical. I understand that is a work problem. Even the normative references to URIs and Unicode have problems. len From: John Cowan [mailto:jcowan@r...] Bullard, Claude L (Len) scripsit: > Umm... isn't that pretty much what the SGML ERB did? > Many could propose but only the self-selected group > could dispose and decide. ISO had the copyrights for > ISO 8879, but XML was created as a subset and the > normative reference maintained. Umm, what normative reference? XML 1.0 has an *informative* reference to ISO 8879. The normative references are about URIs, language tags, and Unicode.
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|