[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: XUL vs. XHTML 2.0/XForms 1.0
Emmanuil Batsis (Manos) wrote: > Flamewars and name hijacking aside, XUL has some very interesting > features that leave XHTML behind, namely the set of reusable widjets and > advanced box model. That's a statemenent ("leave XHTML behind") that would need more qualification. XHTML wasn't designed for applications, it was designed for documents. > But the best part is about extensibility via XBL. Something like DHTML > behaviors but far more efficient, offering creation of custom elements, > events, etc. Actually, most widjects are implemented in this way. Please see: http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG12/#rax . It's an early WD description. Imho it's the way forward. -- Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...> Research Engineer, Expway http://expway.fr/ 7FC0 6F5F D864 EFB8 08CE 8E74 58E6 D5DB 4889 2488
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|