[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Re: XML-based Automation (Was: Zen or Games?)
The topic you may wish to research is the application of analogical reasoning systems. Before we get into this deeply in this thread, I suggest a review of http://www.jfsowa.com/pubs/analog.htm Some background in semiotics (sign processors or a 'species independent theory of cognition, of simply, learning from experience) is useful but not essential. The essential position is: We may deduce a choice, but to get the initial lists of choices to choose from, we typically use analogical means. So we proceed from abduction, to induction, and then to deduction. The issues of drunkenness, menses, current emotional state, etc., have some potential solutions in analogical systems but as I said, fall into the category of Quality of Service. We may wish to dig more deeply into types of analogical engines, the operations by which analogies and analogies of analogies are created, and the probability or weight of evidence. Not so oddly, given XSLT selectors over XML documents, Sowa's methods might be implementable without resorting to exotic technologies. That's a hunch, not an established fact. There are operations and rules specified in the Sowa paper, and it would be interesting if the XSLT gurus took a look at those and commented on how many and with what level of performance they could be implemented in XSLT. len From: Linda Grimaldi [mailto:grimlinda@e...] OK, after my rant on automated voice systems, let me play devil's advocate for just a moment- not sure my heart's in it, but I'll give it a try. I have gotten equally, if not more, frustrated with human customer support interactions- try calling your medical insurance provider one day for a virtually guaranteed example. While we carry on about the risks of allowing a computer to make a decision, human judgement is also inherently flawed (look at the decision to go into Iraq- oops- just got political). And it's not necessarily due to lack of good information. The nice thing about computers is that they have no axes to grind other than the ones they have been programmed with, don't suffer from PMS or other emotional disorders and aren't in a bad mood from dealing with the kids and a checkbook that is always in the red. To use Steve's example, if I am coming home drunk and disorderly, my judgement just may fail me at the critical moment when I turn on that light myself. So, my question is (and it's not entirely tongue in cheek): can automated computer service systems ever hope to provide a level of service that, while not perfect, is at least in some respects the equal of that provided by the average human customer service interaction? And what kinds of service scenarios are best left to humans, and what kinds to computers? I don't necessarily think that only the plebes will get XML automated services, while those who pay will get humans. I think it will depend on the service type- and the plebes may get the humans who hear voices...
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|