[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Data vs. Process was Re: Vocabulary Combination.
Bill de hÓra wrote: > Now this may seemed a rarified argument, or even an irrelevant one, for > controlled domains (worlds) such as cameras or disorders of the blood, but > it's no more rarified than saying for a computer to process XML, regular > expressions are not a sufficient means of expression. Rarefied it may be, but certainly not irrelevant, chiefly because the hard-to-resist benefits of the internetwork topology are opening once-controlled domains to once-unexpected reuse (web services!). Roger's camera ontology is useful to me and the myriad other potential users who are not rabid camera hobbyists precisely because opening that taxonomy onto the internetwork allows our idiosyncratic processes to build upon Roger's work while manipulating it in ways which he never expected. > I hope all the web-ont stuff can be useful - indeed I expect it will be > helpful in getting some business logic out of system code. It won't get the implementation of expert logic out of the idiosyncratic code executed at each processing node, but it will allow those nodes to share and to build upon each other's published ontologies. Respectfully, Walter Perry
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|