[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0

  • To: "'Simon St.Laurent'" <simonstl@s...>, xml-dev@l...
  • Subject: RE: xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
  • Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2003 15:59:51 -0500

RE:  xPath 2.0
An answer I've seen more than once is that private operations 
and specs increase the value of consortia to their members 
by ensuring that members do have information before non-members, 
so in that respect, yes it is a way to keep funds coming in. In 
this, it works like the Augusta golf group that hosts the Masters.   
Exclusive clubs do very well.

But the Masters isn't really a publicly owned event.  It is a 
private event open to the public.  Is the web is a public utility 
or a class of private services?   Careful how you answer that.

Call the works recommendations or specifications, and that is honest.  
That is what the W3C says by policy, even if their members and 
representatives say otherwise for quotation.

In so far as protecting private information from competitors, 
it doesn't do that nor does it keep things out of the press.
That is not to say it doesn't do work of value.  One has to 
ask from point to point, cui bono?  The answer is not always 
the same.  I don't think the secrecy oaths do them as 
much good as they think.  It might be a strategy to 
restrain the impulsive among them.  It's a strategy many 
organizations share.  

len

-----Original Message-----
From: Simon St.Laurent [mailto:simonstl@s...]
Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2003 8:20 PM
To: xml-dev@l...
Subject: Re:  xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0


AndrewWatt2000@a... writes:
>I suspect that at least one aspect of the answer to the question of
>why a private consortium is fairly straightforward - to provide a
>funding mechanism.

Sure - but the W3C also claims, at least in its PR - a rather important
public mission.  Finding the balance between the public and private is
difficult, and I think Len pointed out how unbalanced the situation
appears to be for this particular aspect of W3C process.

It's hardly like the W3C keeps its specs private to gather more funding,
remember.

-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org

-----------------------------------------------------------------
The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>

The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/

To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
 

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.


Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.