[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Vocabulary Combination and optional namespaces

• To: xml-dev <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Vocabulary Combination and optional namespaces
• From: james anderson <james.anderson@s...>
• Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 16:22:24 +0200
• Organization: nil
• References: <ab7bdvs3gol4j4trlefsiq6g4bfbaou70f@4...> <3ED5B096.9080102@t...> <3ED6062E.4080403@b...> <002801c325e8$9b883060$a000a8c0@SeairthA31> <3ED61653.20209@b...>
• Reply-to: james.anderson@s...

does soap permit you to atleast annotate the Body element with additional
namespace declarations?

Joe Gregorio wrote:
> 
> ...
> >>
> >><soap:Envelope
> >>  xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"
> >>  <soap:Header/>
> >>    <soap:Body>
> >>      <rss version="2.0">
> >>        <channel>
> >>          <title>...
> >
> >
> ...
>
> There is one _SOAP_ problem with above example, and that is some
> WSDL tools require that the element directly inside the
> soap:Body be in a non-nil namespace.
> 
>         -joe
>

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Vocabulary Combination and optional namespaces
    • From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>

• References:
  • Vocabulary Combination
    • From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>
  • Re: Vocabulary Combination
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
  • Vocabulary Combination and optional namespaces
    • From: Joe Gregorio <joe@b...>
  • Re: Vocabulary Combination and optional namespaces
    • From: "Seairth Jacobs" <seairth@s...>
  • Re: Vocabulary Combination and optional namespaces
    • From: Joe Gregorio <joe@b...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Vocabulary Combination and optional namespaces
• Next by Date: Re: Vocabulary Combination and optional namespaces
• Previous by thread: Re: Vocabulary Combination and optional namespaces
• Next by thread: Re: Vocabulary Combination and optional namespaces
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread