[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: (data) medium is the message
> Maybe not completely compatible, but certainly complementary. > Google for "XML normal form," a lot of people are working > on this. I'll be danged if I didn't independently write about this same topic well over a year ago. Unfortunately, it was in chapter of a book that appears fated never to see the light of day... <sigh> I wasn't as formal as http://www.cs.ualberta.ca/~yuan/courses/692/lectures/xnf/xnf.pdf, either. But it was basically the same method of applying functional dependency analysis (the motivation for relational normalization) to XML documents. The thing is, though, is that you don't want all your XML documents to be normalized. The point of using a mapping is that you can note where an XML source is not normalized (e.g., components that contain replicated data), and recognize it as such when porting data over to a relational model. And you'll want to check that the XML data was truly replicated faithfully.
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|