[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Ten new XQuery, XSLT 2.0 and XPath 2.0 Working Drafts
> -----Original Message----- > From: Mike Champion [mailto:mc@x...] > Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2003 12:46 PM > To: xml-dev@l... >> If there were one spec defined solely in terms of >> elements, attributes and text, and another built on >> top of that one that added typed data, then sure, >> I'd use the former and simply not bother with the latter. > > That's the point of the "conformance levels", so people who just need > elements and attributes and text could (in principle) just > use tools that > don't bother with the latter. I haven't ever seen this claim made in the context of XQuery or related specs in the past. Can you provide some rationale for making this assertion? What conformance levels mean from the perspective of XQuery has been clearly spelled out in the XQuery language working draft for at least the past 6 months. If you are unaware of it I suggest reading http://www.w3.org/TR/xquery/#id-conformance -- PITHY WORDS OF WISDOM Other people's tools only work in other people's gardens. This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|