[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: ANN: owl.dtd
John Cowan <cowan@m...> wrote: | The RDF/XML syntax is designed to minimize the Hamming distance between | any fairly well designed data-oriented XML and valid RDF. An example demonstrating this assertion would be enlightening. Right now, I'm not sure I understand how "Hamming distance" applies. All the more so because I don't find any evidence of "design" in RDF/XML syntax: on the contrary it's all too obvious that some people were in an inordinate rush to start tossing taggery into Netploder. When it - naturally, later - came to light that DTDs probably wouldn't "allow" such happy-go-taggy insouciance, the tack to take became, "Well, this DTD stuff is no damn good." BTDT. http://listserv.heanet.ie/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind9508&L=html-wg&P=R14154 | In other words, it maximizes flexibility; there is *always* more than | one way to do it. Yes. and that's why I find the claim of maximum flexibility dubious.
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|