[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Reply-to munging
> Arg, why is it that xml-dev is the only mailing list that I use that > requires a "reply to all" to get a copy to the list? Other lists seem to > work in the exact opposite fashion of xml-dev... Not for me. I'm on 34 mailing lists (yes, it's crazy, and so often I have to mass delete one or another). Only two of them have the annoying behavior of munging the reply-to. Most act as XML-DEV does in that regard, thank goodness. The question of whether or not to munge reply-to is a guaranteed flame-war starter, but I just wanted to put in my 2c that XML-DEV does this rightly, regardless of other technical issues. -- Uche Ogbuji Fourthought, Inc. http://uche.ogbuji.net http://4Suite.org http://fourthought.com Gems From the [Python/XML] Archives - http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2003/04/09/py-xm l.html Introducing N-Triples - http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/xml/library/x-thi nk17/index.html Use internal references in XML vocabularies - http://www-106.ibm.com/developerw orks/xml/library/x-tipvocab.html EXSLT by example - http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/library/x-exslt.html The worry about program wizards - http://www.adtmag.com/article.asp?id=7238 Use rdf:about and rdf:ID effectively in RDF/XML - http://www-106.ibm.com/develo perworks/xml/library/x-tiprdfai.html
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|