[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: (data) medium is the message
For me, it's not an issue of "how do I represent this data?", but "how do I define this data so that it can be represented several different ways?" (and efficiently). There's certainly a lot of effort being expended in the development of mapping between relational and object models, and between object models and XML document models right now. The problem is that all mapping technologies seem to require a primacy of one model over the other. For example, I can generate class defs from a document model (Castor, JAXB), or I can generate document models from class definitions (JiBX). Is there a universal mapping language that can be used across all data representations (a.k.a. mediums)? At the risk of sounding like a thrall of certain fascists, I really do think that any such universal mapping language will, at it's heart, be formulated on relational algebra. That's not to say that all models must conform to integrity constraints under all operations; what it does say is that those potential integrity violations are understood and handled correctly when data is moved from one representation to the next through the defined mapping operations. I believe we're a long way from getting a mapping language that's both universal and easy to use. It may be a language with many dialects, each suited from a particular set of representations and mapping direction. It does seem, though, that the current technique of writing one-off Java, C++, and XSLT algorithms to perform these representational transforms is horribly error prone.
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|