[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Why Not NDATA? (WAS RE: CDATA)
Thanks. I can nail that to the wall next to the "it's only a syntax" rule that gets broken every time a programming team needs a data model. Given a berm, they will burrow. len From: Simon St.Laurent [mailto:simonstl@s...] clbullar@i... (Bullard, Claude L (Len)) writes: >Why not NDATA? I think Rick Jelliffe covered this last week better than I ever will. http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200303/msg00739.html
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|