[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Roger Costello: My Version of "Why use OWL?"
jonathan@o... (Jonathan Borden) writes: >> Wow. This is where I really have to wonder if OWL is Karl Popper's >> revenge on the world, a naive view of useful information as a >> collection of facts, "objective knowledge". > >Revenge? Is this a problem? :-) It is indeed a problem if you don't share the philosophy of knowledge underlying this technology. >Indeed it is common practice to informally refer to a particular >collection of triples as a "knowledge base" People even give presentations on "knowledge technology" and audiences listen. I don't know whether the problem lies with the speakers or the audience, but I try hard to avoid such conversation and consider it meaningless if not dangerous when I encounter it. >I expect that any statement that is strictly limited to elements and >attributes has already been made, or else is a rehash of another >statement that has already been made, probably originating in the XML >1.0 rec itself modulo some issues with what really is UNICODE etc... >From a knowledge technologist's perspective, perhaps. I don't think conversation on using markup has even really gotten started, though, and there's certainly plenty of room for tools development that's barely been expored. Given the choice of conversations, I'll stick to the strange little world of characters and markup rather than striving to build global meaning. -- Simon St.Laurent Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets Errors, errors, all fall down! http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|