[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: XML+CSS, DENG (was: Re: InfoPath, OpenOffice, XF
> >Doug and Elliotte, don't you have Mozilla and/or Opera available next > >to IE on your machines? > > > > Sure, but I'm damned if I'm going to open that browser just because > the site doesn't display in the browser I'm using right now. And > Flash doesn't work on IE all the time. I routinely see IE with broken > or out of date Flash installations, if they have it at all. I'm not > going to serve any site I can serve in plain vanilla HTML in anything > else. That's fine. Frank was complaining about the poor IE CSS implementation, and I started this primarily by enforcing his point and saying, "we even managed to write an XML+CSS implementation that this better than IE in 25k flash actionscript". I didn't imply that I've solved all the world's problems. Coming to your point, I'd agree that if you want to reach the most people you can over the web without any prior knowledge, you'd better stick to something like XHTML Basic. I'm thinking more of hotspots on the web, semantic islands, e.g. a forum, with a heavy bi-directional communication aspect, e.g. where you initially sign up, make a conscious decision, where preserving content in its semantics instead of plain text offers significant advantages, the barrier is significantly lowered if you can offer "use Flash in WinIE or Mozilla/Netscape or Opera". But, nevermind, I know that this is the temple of criticism, and on other parts of the web people say "thank you for increasing my options" [1]... :-) - Sebastian [1] http://www.onrelease.org/?cat=13
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|