[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: ANN: White Paper - "Using OWL to Avoid SyntacticRigor Mor
uche.ogbuji@f... (Uche Ogbuji) writes: >> There is - or should be - a lot of room for markup applications >> without the "Knowledge Technology" claims piling on. > >To be fair there is - or should be - a lot of room for data processing >applications without the markup claims piling on. If you're going to use markup, you need to think about markup. If you're doing data processing and don't give a damn about markup, there's probably something better than markup out there you should be using. I'm not using knowledge technologies, so I don't feel obligated to think about them. If I start working in OWL or anything heavy-duty in RDF, I'd feel obligated. The kinds of labels used in XML don't require such theory, IMHO. While it's helpful to understand the relational calculus to normalize data for storage in relational databases, there's also a level where you can do normalization (I call it "information demolition") without ever getting into the calculus. Hell, I don't think we've begun to figure out what we can do with the syntax. Rushing forward into semantic theory seems really premature. -- Simon St.Laurent Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets Errors, errors, all fall down! http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|