[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: 3 possible approaches for representing concepts
Uche Ogbuji wrote: > Joe, BTW, I'm with you on selecting #2. #1 and #3 probably mean that at some > point there will come a need to break down the semantics in the complex GI, and I > think that GIs should be as close to atomic as possible for the expected life of > the data. BTW my personal prejudice is also for #2, *but* #2 is just as likely to need to be *composed* into a more monolithic form as #1 and #3 are likely to need de-composing. And that's just the point. Once we posit the internetwork providing a web relationship among processing nodes, once we truly expect reuse and repurposing, it makes no sense to chose a markup style based on an anticipated use downstream: the most valuable uses over time will be the unanticipated ones. Respectfully, Walter Perry
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|