[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: InfoPath, OpenOffice, XForms (Was: Low-end Office 1 1 won

• To: 'Uche Ogbuji' <uche.ogbuji@f...>
• Subject: RE: InfoPath, OpenOffice, XForms (Was: Low-end Office 1 1 won't do user schemas)
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 08:39:20 -0500
• Cc: xml-dev@l...

So answer the question.

Which XML features should be included in all versions of 
all office products regardless of vendor?

len

From: Uche Ogbuji [mailto:uche.ogbuji@f...]

Considering that MS has always loaded down their software with tons
of features that Auntie Mame would never be able to use, I find your
central premise rather hollow.

• Prev by Date: Re: redefining enumeration?
• Next by Date: RE: Draft US Government policyon XML Namespaces
• Previous by thread: OT: Patterns on XML-dev
• Next by thread: RE: Draft US Government policyon XML Namespaces
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread