[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: XML's Scylla and Charybdis - parse and regexp
As far as I'm concerned there is an XML data model. It's currently specced by the W3C and is named the XQuery & XPath 2.0 data model. It'sXML infoset based, meets most of the requirements of people like Joe Gregorio who want regex-able XML and works well for both untyped or typed data. The name is a mouthful, so I tend to call it the XPath data model for short although I've recently taken to calling it the XML data model. ________________________________ From: Sean McGrath [mailto:sean.mcgrath@p...] Sent: Tue 4/1/2003 12:48 AM To: xml-dev@l... Subject: XML's Scylla and Charybdis - parse and regexp This is at the core of why I've always argued that we *do* need a data model for XML and we *do* need something like common XML because I want my processing to be both correct *and* non-lossy (high input fidelity). Is that too much to ask? Any I the only one who wants both? Sean http://seanmcgrath.blogspot.com ----------------------------------------------------------------- The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|